General Corona Virus Discussion

   #403  

Uwe

Benevolent Dictator
Administrator
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
49,725
Reaction score
34,022
Location
USA
VCDS Serial number
HC100001
   #404  

Ronaldo

Verified VCDS User
Verified
Joined
Feb 13, 2019
Messages
143
Reaction score
144
Location
Brazil
VCDS Serial number
C?ID=357813
Terd Immunity.........

Well, that's a little embarrassing to say but in my country the response to the virus was probably among the worst in the world, so now we have a case study on herd immunity for Covid19. That's the only explanation for the decline in infections and deaths in the studied city, since safety guidelines were poorly followed and social distancing was almost inexistent during the peak of the pandemic. The bad news is that the herd immunity was supposedly achieved with around 66% of the population infected.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Uwe
   #405  

Uwe

Benevolent Dictator
Administrator
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
49,725
Reaction score
34,022
Location
USA
VCDS Serial number
HC100001
   #407  

Ronaldo

Verified VCDS User
Verified
Joined
Feb 13, 2019
Messages
143
Reaction score
144
Location
Brazil
VCDS Serial number
C?ID=357813
   #409  

Uwe

Benevolent Dictator
Administrator
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
49,725
Reaction score
34,022
Location
USA
VCDS Serial number
HC100001
Oh boy here we go!

Examine the premises behind this article.

1) It's based on the assumption that mask-wearing is effective despite data from numerous places showing a substantial increase in cases shortly after mask mandates were imposed. The timing correlation between these "spikes" and the mandates should be enough to make one wonder whether mask mandates aren't actually counter-productive.

2) It's also based on the assumption that people remain just as fastidious about hand-washing as they were several months ago, and personal observations tell me this is not the case. Hand-washing only works if you do it and do it thoroughly.

That said, it is of course an evolutionary advantage for a virus to become more contagious, but also to produce less severe symptoms.

-Uwe-
 
   #410  

Jack@European_Parts

Gone But Not Forgotten
Professional VCDS User
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
21,923
Reaction score
9,309
Location
Montgomery, NY, USA
VCDS Serial number
C?ID=57337
   #415  

Uwe

Benevolent Dictator
Administrator
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
49,725
Reaction score
34,022
Location
USA
VCDS Serial number
HC100001

“We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” Nabarro said.

-Uwe-
 
   #418  

Uwe

Benevolent Dictator
Administrator
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
49,725
Reaction score
34,022
Location
USA
VCDS Serial number
HC100001
This article claims he "ignored guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention" without providing a any evidence, such as a link to the guidelines he ostensibly ignored.

What has happened to actual journalism?

So can anyone care to provide a link to CDC guidelines that contradict what the congressional attending physician stated they are?

-Uwe-
 
   #419  

Jack@European_Parts

Gone But Not Forgotten
Professional VCDS User
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
21,923
Reaction score
9,309
Location
Montgomery, NY, USA
VCDS Serial number
C?ID=57337
What has happened to actual journalism?

It's all YELLOW URINE journalism now!

L9St8uq4w5oO-dKhwdWzj0gPZMMVbevUd0VmDXJAh3hkIyT1oyoGKDyfYCmW14Nb8c7XlYSCMUj7AprNFt0CzkK-0gq_UPiJeg5OOhPHTk2FoSVwK7LV8gvMxWCtkF3jrJssSIk
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Uwe
   #420  

BB tt

Verified VCDS User
Verified
Joined
Aug 16, 2019
Messages
61
Reaction score
30
Location
TX, USA
VCDS Serial number
C?ID=281085
New CDC Report Shows Wearing Masks Didn’t Help for July.


"...showed that 85% of those who contracted COVID-19 during July among the study group either “always” or “often” wore face coverings within the 14 days before they were infected. More than 70% of those outpatient individuals who tested positive reported always wearing masks. Just 3.9% reported never wearing a mask. "

" The reality is that the pores in surgical masks are about 30 times larger than the average size of SARS-CoV-2 virions, and some of the cheap (but more comfortable) cotton masks that are commonly worn have pores hundreds of times larger than the virus particles. "

"Whether it’s Japan, Hong Kong, Israel, France, Peru, Philippines, Hawaii, California, Miami, or Argentina, the virus spread wildly months after strict mask mandates have already been in place"
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Uwe
Back
Top