What am I missing? What is it that makes you think that the campaign is applicable here?
Did you read what happens about a loose or faulty ground connection in both documents or that the modules are just a plain pervasive failure due to mechanical/electrical designs purported?
Do you now see it does damage too the module entirely/internally & due to same widespread design, not just the narrow VIN range specified & can indeed create coding loss or any erroneous faults as a result impairing operation & by mere Google or forum search?
The reason I know so much about this, is I made a Federal case out of it literally & with congressional investigation, however, only to be dismissed by EPA OBD administrator & ultimately too find, I was correct in end with Diesel-Gate purported, did you know that too?
See when the cars first came here they would light up the "Engine MIL" In addition to "/Brake ESP Light MIL's" too, if a problem showed itself in module, you know similar to yours?
Due to this MIL for "check engine light" I made the case that it was SMOG related due to configuration of long coding being requested and faults I saw, so I reported to VW first, being denied and then EPA + Feds?
VW ultimately re-flashed the Engine controller to make the MIL be ignored, in engine controller and never publicly announced it for and CAL ID change & indeed the repair manual still states in it and so did the conformity application, do you see what I was speaking of in trans controller now, Uwe did?
As you can see, I pay attention to conformity applications and software levels, in addition to useful life warranty for these reasons and the recalls for patterns?
You may FOIA the documents if you like from EPA directly, did you know that too?
“Fault 01130 MUST have 125 shown in the 4th line of the Expanded ambient conditions to qualify for module replacement and/or fault 16352 MUST have 96 shown in the 4th line of the Expanded ambient conditions to qualify for module replacement under this Campaign.
Diagnosis and repair of faults other than the faults listed above will not be covered under this Campaign and should be addressed prior to updating the Control Module.”
This is what makes me think that Saftey Recall 45F2 is N/A to my car. It seems pretty cut and dry that if I attempted to demand that the J104 be replaced under this warranty that not only would I be denied since I don’t really have a leg to stand on, but that the problem that I have would remain uncorrected even if I were to somehow convince them to conduct the repair.
You are wrong know why, because software and dissemination of /CAL ID conformity configurations matter & does not the OBD2 light illuminate as a result of engine and transmission, does your configuration now match what is publicly disseminated?