Despite the mass of independent scientific evidence to the contrary a jury (who probably didn't understand the technicalities) decides based on the issues of one person to deprive the rest of us of one of the most useful pesticides currently manufactured - crazy, totally crazy!Great, now we have courts telling regulatory agencies that they MUST ban stuff.
I don't think there was a jury involved in that one.
The UK media reported it as a jury decision - incorrectly it seems.
Yep. Going back to the article, it was a Federal Appeals Court. That's a panel of judges, not a jury. More specifically, it was the Ninth Circuit, which is one level below the US Supreme Court. It is also often referred to as the "Ninth Circus" or the "Nutty Ninth" because it has historically leaned far left in its decisions, and it seems to believe it can make law instead of just interpreting law, as seems to be happening in this case. As a result, there's quite a history of its decisions being overturned on further appeal to the Supreme Court.
[h=1]TRUMP’S E.P.A. IS JUST GOING TO LET “BEAUTIFUL, CLEAN” COAL PLANTS REGULATE THEMSELVES[/h]
And none of that is related to Trump's campaign in any way.
Told you everything you know, Mueller has. Told you everything he knows, Mueller has not.
So uh... that was adjudicated at 4PM today. We won't see; we already saw. Past tense.
On the one hand, it is a seedy little distraction from the main event. Although it's funny to watch the mental gymnastics needed to object to this, while simultaneously being perfectly fine with Ken Starr's pursuit of Bill Clinton for an affair that began after his initial appointment.
My understanding is that McCain had explicitly requested for Trump not attend.
That's what has been reported on the news media in the UK too.
