The TRUMP POTUS "Tribute" & "Tribulations" of the Politically Incorrect....!

Let This Thread Live or Shut It Down?

  • Let it Live!

    Votes: 14 87.5%
  • Kill it With Fire!

    Votes: 2 12.5%

  • Total voters
    16
  • Poll closed .

Uwe

Benevolent Dictator
Administrator
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
49,311
Reaction score
33,834
Location
USA
VCDS Serial number
HC100001
[h=1]California judge orders porn star to pay Trump legal fees[/h]
https://www.aol.com/article/news/20...s-porn-star-to-pay-trump-legal-fees/23615624/

Why do I have this feeling that there's a glitch in the matrix?
Back in October:
Judge James Otero, a George W. Bush appointee, dismissed the suit ... The judge also ruled that Trump is entitled to attorney fees — in other words, Daniels has to pay his legal bills.

I guess this latest ruling just sets the amount she has to pay?
 

Jack@European_Parts

Gone But Not Forgotten
Professional VCDS User
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
21,923
Reaction score
9,308
Location
Montgomery, NY, USA
VCDS Serial number
C?ID=57337
Doesn't Trump get to now sue her and her lawyer for additional fees and civil damages going forward too & even though this court ruling is subject to appeal?
 

Jack@European_Parts

Gone But Not Forgotten
Professional VCDS User
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
21,923
Reaction score
9,308
Location
Montgomery, NY, USA
VCDS Serial number
C?ID=57337
[h=1]U.S. federal judge rules Obamacare unconstitutional[/h]https://www.aol.com/article/news/2018/12/14/us-federal-judge-rules-obamacare-unconstitutional/23618628/
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uwe

Uwe

Benevolent Dictator
Administrator
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
49,311
Reaction score
33,834
Location
USA
VCDS Serial number
HC100001
cZG6UNA.jpg
 

Larry Manton

Verified VCDS User
Verified
Joined
May 19, 2016
Messages
822
Reaction score
411
Location
USA
VCDS Serial number
C?ID=112505
Seems POTUS has forgotten that he said Mexico would be paying :facepalm:

No Dave, U.S. always pays, nothing has changed, were used to it.

That is why Infantry is the Queen of battle, she is always getting fucked. And we use a lot of infantry, that is why some of it is now on the border, and NO, Mexico is not paying for it.

It is a sovereign border, not in Syria, not Iraq, Not Bosnia, but our border, and willing to pay in blood, JMO.

LARIMORE
 

PetrolDave

Verified VCDS User
Verified
Joined
Dec 16, 2014
Messages
7,989
Reaction score
7,823
Location
Westbury, UK
VCDS Serial number
C?ID=1423
No Dave, U.S. always pays, nothing has changed, were used to it.
But POTUS said on several occasions, both during the campaign and after becoming POTUS, that Mexico would pay - so it seems (to an outsider like me) that he has forgotten what he has said on many previous occasions?
 

jyoung8607

FoRT
Verified
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
2,780
Reaction score
4,490
Location
Cincinnati, OH
VCDS Serial number
C?ID=25607
But POTUS said on several occasions, both during the campaign and after becoming POTUS, that Mexico would pay - so it seems (to an outsider like me) that he has forgotten what he has said on many previous occasions?
That's because you have developed object permanence. It turns out that many US voters haven't, and there's a lot of money to be made exploiting that vulnerability.

The current symptom will be gone soon enough, but fixing the root cause will take generations.
 
Last edited:

Uwe

Benevolent Dictator
Administrator
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
49,311
Reaction score
33,834
Location
USA
VCDS Serial number
HC100001
That's because you have developed object permanence. It turns out that many US voters haven't, and there's a lot of money to be made exploiting that vulnerability.

The current symptom will be gone soon enough, but fixing the root cause will take generations.
They're grown completely accustomed to being lied to by candidates and even sitting presidents.
 

jyoung8607

FoRT
Verified
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
2,780
Reaction score
4,490
Location
Cincinnati, OH
VCDS Serial number
C?ID=25607
They're grown completely accustomed to being lied to by candidates and even sitting presidents.
What an interesting selection on your part.

When I think of the word "lie", I think of a falsehood spoken by someone who knows it's false, with an intent to deceive the listener. Do you agree?

Cite the specific part of the PPACA which eliminated existing plans.
 

Jack@European_Parts

Gone But Not Forgotten
Professional VCDS User
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
21,923
Reaction score
9,308
Location
Montgomery, NY, USA
VCDS Serial number
C?ID=57337
"Sir if I may"


https://www.politico.com/story/2009/09/bill-says-tax-when-obama-said-not-027384


In the most contentious exchange of President Barack Obama’s marathon of five Sunday shows, he said it is “not true” that a requirement for individuals to get health insurance under a key reform plan now being debated amounts to a tax increase.
But he could look it up — in the bill.

Page 29, sentence one of the bill introduced by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont) says: “The consequence for not maintaining insurance would be an excise tax.”
And the rest of the bill is clear that the Finance Committee does, in fact, consider it a tax: “The excise tax would be assessed through the tax code and applied as an additional amount of Federal tax owed.”
The bill requires every American, with few exceptions, to carry health insurance. To enforce this individual mandate, the Senate Finance Committee created the excise tax as a penalty for people who don’t have insurance – and it can run as much as $3,800 a year per family.
The House bill also refers to the penalties for not carrying insurance as a tax. It calls for a “tax on individuals without acceptable health care coverage” and amends the tax code to implement it.
The questions from ABC’s George Stephanopoulos highlighted a politically dangerous new aspect of the health reform debate for Obama – as critics from Republican leaders to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce say his reform proposals amount to a middle-class tax increase. Obama promised during the campaign that Americans earning less than $250,000 a year would not see any tax increases from an Obama administration.
Obama strongly denied that the mandate amounts to a tax increase – saying it was no different than requiring people to have auto insurance and charging a penalty if they don’t. He also said it was important for everyone to have insurance so that people who do carry insurance don’t have to shoulder the load for people who don’t. The excise tax is designed as an enforcement mechanism to ensure people will carry insurance.
Obama also told Stephanopoulos that Americans are already facing a “tax increase” from soaring insurance premiums and argued that health reform will curb the future costs and actually save Americans money.
During the campaign, Obama resisted the idea of an individual mandate to own insurance, but since then has been open to it.
But the questions about tax increases are part of an emerging Republican line of attack. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell on Sunday said, “I don't know anybody in my Republican conference in the Senate who's in favor of doing nothing on health care. . . . We don't think it's a good idea to raise taxes on small businesses and on individuals in the heart of a recession. There are some serious differences about what ought to be done.”
Obama also was pressed on whether new fees on insurance companies and drug makers to pay for reform would also amount to a tax levy on the middle class, because the companies would be likely to pass through the cost to consumers.
“I can still keep that promise because as I’ve said about two-thirds of what we’ve proposed would be from money that’s already in the health care system but just being spent badly,” Obama told CBS’s Bob Schieffer on “Face the Nation.”
“Now we are going to have to find some additional sources of revenue for the other third or so of the health care plan, and I’ve provided a long list of approaches that would not have impact on middle-class Americans. They’re not going to be forced to pay for this.”
The “Chairman’s Mark: America’s Healthy Future Act of 2009” says people up to 300 percent of the poverty line could pay a maximum of $750 per year if they don’t have insurance, and up to $1,500 per family. Above that line, the excise tax for individuals is $950 per year, with a family maximum of $3,800.
Here's the exchange between Obama and Stephanopoulos on ABC’s “This Week,” taped Friday at the White House:

Under Obamacare, most people must have health insurance or pay a tax penalty. For 2017, the penalty is $695 per adult (up to a family maximum of $2,085), or 2.5% of household income, whichever is greater.Mar 3, 2018

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2014/11/26/2014-27998/minimum-essential-coverage-and-other-rules-regarding-the-shared-responsibility-payment-for
26 U.S. Code § 5000A - Requirement to maintain minimum essential coverage

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/5000A
Code:
(a)Requirement to maintain minimum essential coverageAn applicable individual shall for each month beginning after 2013 ensure that the individual, and any dependent of the individual who is an applicable individual, is covered under minimum essential coverage for such month. (b)Shared responsibility payment(1)In generalIf a taxpayer who is an applicable individual, or an applicable individual for whom the taxpayer is liable under paragraph (3), fails to meet the requirement of subsection (a) for 1 or more months, then, except as provided in subsection (e), there is hereby imposed on the taxpayer a penalty with respect to such failures in the amount determined under subsection (c). (2)Inclusion with returnAny penalty imposed by this section with respect to any month shall be included with a taxpayer’s return under chapter 1 for the taxable year which includes such month. (3)Payment of penaltyIf an individual with respect to whom a penalty is imposed by this section for any month—(A)is a dependent (as defined in section 152) of another taxpayer for the other taxpayer’s taxable year including such month, such other taxpayer shall be liable for such penalty, or (B)files a joint return for the taxable year including such month, such individual and the spouse of such individual shall be jointly liable for such penalty. (c)[1] Amount of penalty(1)In generalThe amount of the penalty imposed by this section on any taxpayer for any taxable year with respect to failures described in subsection (b)(1) shall be equal to the lesser of—(A)the sum of the monthly penalty amounts determined under paragraph (2) for months in the taxable year during which 1 or more such failures occurred, or (B)an amount equal to the national average premium for qualified health plans which have a bronze level of coverage, provide coverage for the applicable family size involved, and are offered through Exchanges for plan years beginning in the calendar year with or within which the taxable year ends. (2)Monthly penalty amountsFor purposes of paragraph (1)(A), the monthly penalty amount with respect to any taxpayer for any month during which any failure described in subsection (b)(1) occurred is an amount equal to [SUP]1[/SUP]⁄[SUB]12[/SUB] of the greater of the following amounts:(A)Flat dollar amountAn amount equal to the lesser of—(i)the sum of the applicable dollar amounts for all individuals with respect to whom such failure occurred during such month, or (ii)300 percent of the applicable dollar amount (determined without regard to paragraph (3)(C)) for the calendar year with or within which the taxable year ends. (B)Percentage of incomeAn amount equal to the following percentage of the excess of the taxpayer’s household income for the taxable year over the amount of gross income specified in section 6012(a)(1) with respect to the taxpayer for the taxable year:(i)1.0 percent for taxable years beginning in 2014. (ii)2.0 percent for taxable years beginning in 2015. (iii)Zero percent for taxable years beginning after 2015. (3)Applicable dollar amountFor purposes of paragraph (1)—(A)In generalExcept as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), the applicable dollar amount is $0. (B)Phase inThe applicable dollar amount is $95 for 2014 and $325 for 2015. (C)Special rule for individuals under age 18If an applicable individual has not attained the age of 18 as of the beginning of a month, the applicable dollar amount with respect to such individual for the month shall be equal to one-half of the applicable dollar amount for the calendar year in which the month occurs. (D)Indexing of amountIn the case of any calendar year beginning after 2016, the applicable dollar amount shall be equal to $695, increased by an amount equal to—(i)$695, multiplied by (ii)the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year, determined by substituting “calendar year 2015” for “calendar year 1992” in subparagraph (B)for “calendar year 2016” in subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof.
If the amount of any increase under clause (i) is not a multiple of $50, such increase shall be rounded to the next lowest multiple of $50.​
(4)Terms relating to income and familiesFor purposes of this section—(A)Family sizeThe family size involved with respect to any taxpayer shall be equal to the number of individuals for whom the taxpayer is allowed a deduction under section 151 (relating to allowance of deduction for personal exemptions) for the taxable year. (B)Household incomeThe term “household income” means, with respect to any taxpayer for any taxable year, an amount equal to the sum of—(i)the modified adjusted gross income of the taxpayer, plus (ii)the aggregate modified adjusted gross incomes of all other individuals who—(I)were taken into account in determining the taxpayer’s family size under paragraph (1), and (II)were required to file a return of tax imposed by section 1 for the taxable year. (C)Modified adjusted gross incomeThe term “modified adjusted gross income” means adjusted gross income increased by—(i)any amount excluded from gross income under section 911, and (ii)any amount of interest received or accrued by the taxpayer during the taxable year which is exempt from tax.
(d)Applicable individualFor purposes of this section—(1)In generalThe term “applicable individual” means, with respect to any month, an individual other than an individual described in paragraph (2), (3), or (4). (2)Religious exemptions(A)Religious conscience exemptionSuch term shall not include any individual for any month if such individual has in effect an exemption under section 1311(d)(4)(H) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act which certifies that such individual is—(i)a member of a recognized religious sect or division thereof which is described in section 1402(g)(1), and (ii)an adherent of established tenets or teachings of such sect or division as described in such section. (B)Health care sharing ministry(i)In generalSuch term shall not include any individual for any month if such individual is a member of a health care sharing ministry for the month. (ii)Health care sharing ministryThe term “health care sharing ministry” means an organization—(I)which is described in section 501(c)(3) and is exempt from taxation under section 501(a), (II)members of which share a common set of ethical or religious beliefs and share medical expenses among members in accordance with those beliefs and without regard to the State in which a member resides or is employed, (III)members of which retain membership even after they develop a medical condition, (IV)which (or a predecessor of which) has been in existence at all times since December 31, 1999, and medical expenses of its members have been shared continuously and without interruption since at least December 31, 1999, and (V)which conducts an annual audit which is performed by an independent certified public accounting firm in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and which is made available to the public upon request. (3)Individuals not lawfully presentSuch term shall not include an individual for any month if for the month the individual is not a citizen or national of the United States or an alien lawfully present in the United States. (4)Incarcerated individualsSuch term shall not include an individual for any month if for the month the individual is incarcerated, other than incarceration pending the disposition of charges. (e)ExemptionsNo penalty shall be imposed under subsection (a) with respect to—(1)Individuals who cannot afford coverage(A)In generalAny applicable individual for any month if the applicable individual’s required contribution (determined on an annual basis) for coverage for the month exceeds 8 percent of such individual’s household income for the taxable year described in section 1412(b)(1)(B) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. For purposes of applying this subparagraph, the taxpayer’s household income shall be increased by any exclusion from gross income for any portion of the required contribution made through a salary reduction arrangement. (B)Required contributionFor purposes of this paragraph, the term “required contribution” means—(i)in the case of an individual eligible to purchaseminimum essential coverage consisting of coverage through an eligible-employer-sponsored plan, the portion of the annual premium which would be paid by the individual (without regard to whether paid through salary reduction or otherwise) for self-only coverage, or (ii)in the case of an individual eligible only to purchaseminimum essential coverage described in subsection (f)(1)(C), the annual premium for the lowest cost bronze plan available in the individual market through the Exchange in the State in the rating area in which the individual resides (without regard to whether the individual purchased a qualified health plan through the Exchange), reduced by the amount of the credit allowable under section 36B for the taxable year (determined as if the individual was covered by a qualified health plan offered through the Exchange for the entire taxable year). (C)Special rules for individuals related to employeesFor purposes of subparagraph (B)(i), if an applicable individual is eligible for minimum essential coverage through an employer by reason of a relationship to an employee, the determination under subparagraph (A) shall be made by reference to [2] required contribution of the employee. (D)IndexingIn the case of planyears beginning in any calendar year after 2014, subparagraph (A) shall be applied by substituting for “8 percent” the percentage the Secretary of Health and Human Services determines reflects the excess of the rate of premium growth between the preceding calendar year and 2013 over the rate of income growth for such period. (2)Taxpayers with income below filing thresholdAny applicable individual for any month during a calendar year if the individual’s household income for the taxable year described in section 1412(b)(1)(B) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is less than the amount of gross income specified in section 6012(a)(1) with respect to the taxpayer. (3)Members of Indian tribesAny applicable individual for any month during which the individual is a member of an Indian tribe (as defined in section 45A(c)(6)). (4)Months during short coverage gaps(A)In generalAny month the last day of which occurred during a period in which the applicable individual was not covered by minimum essential coverage for a continuous period of less than 3 months. (B)Special rulesFor purposes of applying this paragraph—(i)the length of a continuous period shall be determined without regard to the calendar years in which months in such period occur, (ii)if a continuous period is greater than the period allowed under subparagraph (A), no exception shall be provided under this paragraph for any month in the period, and (iii)if there is more than 1 continuous period described in subparagraph (A) covering months in a calendar year, the exception provided by this paragraph shall only apply to months in the first of such periods.
The Secretary shall prescribe rules for the collection of the penalty imposed by this section in cases where continuous periods include months in more than 1 taxable year.​
(5)HardshipsAny applicable individual who for any month is determined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 1311(d)(4)(H) to have suffered a hardship with respect to the capability to obtain coverage under a qualified health plan.
(f)Minimum essential coverageFor purposes of this section—(1)In generalThe term “minimum essential coverage” means any of the following:(A)Government sponsored programsCoverage under—(i)the Medicare program under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act, (ii)the Medicaid program under title XIX of the Social Security Act, (iii)the CHIP program under title XXI of the Social Security Act or under a qualified CHIP look-alike program (as defined in section 2107(g) of the Social Security Act), (iv)medical coverage under chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, including coverage under the TRICARE program; [3] (v)a health care program under chapter 17 or 18 of title 38, United States Code, as determined by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in coordination with the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary, (vi)a health plan under section 2504(e) of title 22, United States Code (relating to Peace Corps volunteers); [SUP]3[/SUP] or (vii)the Nonappropriated Fund Health Benefits Program of the Department of Defense, established under section 349 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 10 U.S.C. 1587 note). (B)Employer-sponsored planCoverage under an eligible employer-sponsored plan. (C)Plans in the individual marketCoverage under a health plan offered in the individual market within a State. (D)Grandfathered health planCoverage under a grandfathered health plan. (E)Other coverageSuch other health benefits coverage, such as a State health benefits risk pool, as the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in coordination with the Secretary, recognizes for purposes of this subsection. (2)Eligible employer-sponsored planThe term “eligible employer-sponsored plan” means, with respect to any employee, a group health plan or group health insurance coverage offered by an employer to the employee which is—(A)a governmental plan (within the meaning of section 2791(d)(8) of the Public Health Service Act), or (B)any other plan or coverage offered in the small or large group market within a State.
Such term shall include a grandfathered health plan described in paragraph (1)(D) offered in a group market.​
(3)Excepted benefits not treated as minimum essential coverageThe term “minimum essential coverage” shall not include health insurance coverage which consists of coverage of excepted benefits—(A)described in paragraph (1) of subsection (c) of section 2791 of the Public Health Service Act; or (B)described in paragraph (2), (3), or (4) of such subsection if the benefits are provided under a separate policy, certificate, or contract of insurance. (4)Individuals residing outside United States or residents of territoriesAny applicable individual shall be treated as having minimum essential coverage for any month—(A)if such month occurs during any period described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 911(d)(1) which is applicable to the individual, or (B)if such individual is a bona fide resident of any possession of the United States (as determined under section 937(a)) for such month. (5)Insurance-related termsAny term used in this section which is also used in title I of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act shall have the same meaning as when used in such title.
(g)Administration and procedure(1)In generalThe penalty provided by this section shall be paid upon notice and demand by the Secretary, and except as provided in paragraph (2), shall be assessed and collected in the same manner as an assessable penalty under subchapter B of chapter 68. (2)Special rulesNotwithstanding any other provision of law—(A)Waiver of criminal penaltiesIn the case of any failure by a taxpayer to timely pay any penalty imposed by this section, such taxpayer shall not be subject to any criminal prosecution or penalty with respect to such failure. (B)Limitations on liens and leviesThe Secretary shall not—(i)file notice of lien with respect to any property of a taxpayer by reason of any failure to pay the penalty imposed by this section, or (ii)levy on any such property with respect to such failure.


Fuck Merriam dictionary bullshit statement, read what the Federal Register says!

https://www.federalregister.gov/doc...garding-the-shared-responsibility-payment-for
 
Last edited:

jyoung8607

FoRT
Verified
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
2,780
Reaction score
4,490
Location
Cincinnati, OH
VCDS Serial number
C?ID=25607
The questions from ABC’s George Stephanopoulos highlighted a politically dangerous new aspect of the health reform debate for Obama – as critics from Republican leaders to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce say his reform proposals amount to a middle-class tax increase. Obama promised during the campaign that Americans earning less than $250,000 a year would not see any tax increases from an Obama administration.
The PPACA as originally signed was constructed to make sure no rational middle class family earning less than $250,000 a year would encounter the penalty. Each family was called on to carry their own weight, to the greatest extent they could, with subsidies or Medicare coverage where they couldn't. Thus, no effective increase in taxes.

As an honest person, I'm sure you base your evaluation of his promise based on what he signed, and not the later actions of Republicans who chose to blow holes in the coverage and risk models, placing effective health care out of reach for some. And as a fan of personal responsibility, integrity, and accountability, I'm confident you want others to carry their weight, instead of freeloading on your dime through uncompensated care.

My tax increase was $0. How much was yours?
 

Jack@European_Parts

Gone But Not Forgotten
Professional VCDS User
Joined
Jan 29, 2014
Messages
21,923
Reaction score
9,308
Location
Montgomery, NY, USA
VCDS Serial number
C?ID=57337
The PPACA as originally signed was constructed to make sure no rational middle class family earning less than $250,000 a year would encounter the penalty. Each family was called on to carry their own weight, to the greatest extent they could, with subsidies or Medicare coverage where they couldn't. Thus, no effective increase in taxes.

As an honest person, I'm sure you base your evaluation of his promise based on what he signed, and not the later actions of Republicans who chose to blow holes in the coverage and risk models, placing effective health care out of reach for some. And as a fan of personal responsibility, integrity, and accountability, I'm confident you want others to carry their weight, instead of freeloading on your dime through uncompensated care.

My tax increase was $0. How much was yours?




Would that happen to be the one we couldn't read & wasn't posted for opposition but passed anyway?

What does this say below in Federal Register & If it's not a tax than why is there a tax penalty in the law? Again what does "is" really mean?

Semantics.......another word for BULLSHIT right? :rolleyes:

https://www.federalregister.gov/doc...garding-the-shared-responsibility-payment-for

Actually I want universal single pay healthcare & totally handled by the Government for administrative for citizens or visitors that are here legally and paying, this way there will be no need for the VA healthcare system or it's existing infrastructure can become migrated & so all get the same care to be more fair.
No more supplemental Healthcare insurance, just make it all covered for in hospital/rehabilitation care and if people elect to buy for loss of income insurance etc. than let them.
And no NOPE Not a third party contracting insurance company either for Universal & with a regulated procedure menu for costs to all & posted online in public view & for those that still have or want no healthcare + require at all hospitals such a menu and by all means, let there be independent insurance companies and hospitals for that wish not to get involved in the Universal Plan being completely specialized but essentially bifurcated and not able to take part in the Universal system coffers.

From what I understand, medicare and medicaid pay far more than all the independent insurance companies to hospitals & would pay even more in shear volume if coverage was available.
I'm pretty sick of the stories how the insurance companies didn't pay this or that, so far it appears far more pervasive from my observation than the Government not paying.
Raise fraud liabilities with mandatory penalties on hospitals and doctors & that are not discretionary by a judge, jury or enforcement agencies, this way if found guilty of fraud the person & company is really fucked that purported the actual fraud!
Then make a CAP on civil suits for damages in the Universal system but the sky is the limit for private foolery to keep them accountable to the public & if any healthcare practitioner is found guilty of the aforementioned, poor treatment or negligence, they should lose their license indefinitely in the field + be personally liable with a 3 strikes out rule & zero tolerance for fraud!

Most importantly no elective surgeries for mutilations of the body, such as boob jobs, tummy tucks, dick swaps etc., unless that are warranted for amputees, cancer and or fire or true accident victims.......Personally I'd rather see dental added & since physical sickness indeed does start in mouth from everyone talking shit!

Yeah life isn't fair bla bla bla no one cares!

Happy New Year with Unicorns!

Fuck it 2018 is over!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top