Yes, the has to know the temperature to determine that the conditions for regeneration have been achieved. In fact, most every equipped engine has more than one EGT sensor, and problems with those sensors are a common cause of DPFs getting clogged.
Ah ok. In the video,
@JMR said that if this sensor was faulty, it could trigger regenerations more often, but I don't see how: The pressure difference sensor should be used to make the decision to start a regeneration cycle. On the other hand, it makes sense to use the exhaust gas temperature sensor to confirm that a sufficiently high temperature has been achieved.
What car is this? I've not heard of one that has two SCRs, but then we've gotten no diesels from VAG at all on this side of the pond since MY 2016. I suppose with two SCRs, VAG wanted to be really sure that they weren't over the NOx limits again?
Škoda Superb, engine type 2.0 TDI, EA288 evo, engine code DTUA. The EA288 evo engine was introduced with the VW Golf Mk8 in late 2019. The technology is from Bosch, they call it a "double injection SCR" (
Link to Bosch) system.
If you want an SCR catalyst to be useful in cities, it must be installed right next to the engine, leading to fast warm-up and avoiding cool-down. At this place, your space is somewhat limited, and you cannot make it as big as you might want to. Also, making it bigger increases warm-up time. Solution: Install two of them. Using , I determined a warm-up time of about 2 minutes for SCR1 even at speeds around 20 mph. Besides that, engines that use this NOx aftertreatment layout were planned to be almost compliant with the next step of emission regulation ("Euro 7"). They only want to make minor modifications, like SCR size, or equipping SCR1 with an electric heating powered by the MHEV battery, but they don't want to develop another new engine.
Bosch/VW also say that at very high engine load, an SCR catalyst in the underfloor works better because the one close to the engine gets too warm, but NOx sensor readings don't really confirm this claim. SCR1 seems to work almost always, and I don't see a correlation between high engine load and loss of SCR1 efficiency. Sometimes, it is higher, sometimes it is lower, but I don't get when or why.
Nowadays, all Volkswagen and Mercedes 4 cylinder diesel cars use such a layout. I'm not sure about BMW, but I think they use LNT+SCR in some cars, 2x SCR in others.
Another point after all the discussions about NOx polution from diesel cars is that they didn't just want to be
barely compliant, exactly hitting the legal limit. With real driving emission tests not only being performed, but results being actually published, they wanted to get NOx emission results as low as what their petrol cars typically have.