- Jan 29, 2014
- Reaction score
- VCDS Serial number
Really? Source?In Australia with a 95% double vaccination rate the severe outcome of ICU treatment is about 20 time more likely in an unvaccinated person than a vaccinated person.
Over what period of time was this data collected? Every time I've seen a claim like that and dug into it, the data included a long period of time when hardly anyone was vaccinated (for example all of 2021, or even going back the whole way to the start of the "pandemic".
Then there's the question of how a "vaccinated" person is defined. In the context of claims like this, "vaccinated" often means "at least two weeks since the second shot", and anyone who hasn't passed that threshold is lumped into the "unvaccinated" category. That's mighty convenient in light of the fact that there's a period of several weeks after the first shot when people are actually more vulnerable to infection and and severe outcomes than when if they hadn't taken any shots at all.
When we look at only current data in an honest way, let's say people in the ICU today, or people in the ICU over the last month, the picture changes quite dramatically.
But even if we were to accept your claim as factual, with a "95% double vaccination rate", you guys sure have a raging infection rate now, which makes it quite clear that these so-called vaccines do not prevent transmission or infection. If all they do is prevent a severe outcome, then they should be regarded as prophylactic therapeutics, not as "vaccines", and it absolutely should be a personal choice whether someone takes them or not.