- Joined
- Jan 29, 2014
- Messages
- 4,144
- Reaction score
- 6,216
- Location
- Lansdale, PA, USA
- VCDS Serial number
- HC800000
Less. I've been doing a lot of monitoring using an IoTaWatt to see where my power is going. The absolute highest peaks I've seen in my pretty good-sized house are around 12kW, and that's with both A/C units (total of 5 tons / 60,000 BTUs) running, and simultaneous demand from electric water heater. Those peaks never last a whole hour either, 5-10 minutes or so. Average consumption over a 24h period is under 3.5 kW even on the hottest days. Here's a pretty warm day back in May:The average home draws a peak of 30kW per hour...
kW is a unit of energy (kilowatt), and is not the same thing as kWh (kilowatt-hours). No need to get pedantic. I did get one thing wrong, though, it is 30kW per day, not per hour.kW per hour
... (etc.)
That just makes it even worse per-vehicle!Less. I've been doing a lot of monitoring using an IoTaWatt to see where my power is going. The absolute highest peaks I've seen in my pretty good-sized house are around 12kW, and that's with both A/C units (total of 5 tons / 60,000 BTUs) running, and simultaneous demand from electric water heater. Those peaks never last a whole hour either, 5-10 minutes or so. Average consumption over a 24h period is under 3.5 kW even on the hottest days.
(...)
So a 350 kW charger is more like the peak load of 30 homes rather than 10.
-Uwe-
A little more than one thing. Where to start? (shakes head).kW is a unit of energy (kilowatt), and is not the same thing as kWh (kilowatt-hours). No need to get pedantic. I did get one thing wrong, though, it is 30kW per day, not per hour.
Don't worry, it's a service we offer at no extra cost!No need to get pedantic.
30 kWh / day sounds about right for an average house. I'm rarely less than that (and for sure not in the summer A/C season), but I've got a lot of computer & internet "base load" that runs 24x7.it is 30kW per day, not per hour.
Yes, it does. And to make matters worse, commercial and industrial users don't just pay the utility for kWh or energy they use; they also get hit with a "demand charge", which is typically based on the highest draw during any 15 minute period in a billing cycle. So if you're putting an a 350 kW EV charger and only charge one car a month, consuming say 100 kWh from the grid, which should cost under $20 (places with sane electric rates, probably double that in Cali) you'll also get hit with the demand charge, which if your peak draw really was the 350 kW the charger is capable of, will be hundreds of dollars.That just makes it even worse per-vehicle!
There you go getting pedantic again. For most laymen (of which I am definitely in that camp...), "power" and "energy" are the same thing. Yes, you are technically correct in that "power" is a rate measurement for "energy", which is the effective work output. The rest of what you yammered on about is lawyer-levels of nit-picking for what is effectively a surface-level discussion. I already corrected the relevant error (day vs hour).A little more than one thing. Where to start? (shakes head).
"power" and "energy" are the same thing.
I'll just leave this here.which should cost under $20 (places with sane electric rates, probably double that in Cali)
For the layman... (which is the important qualifier here), they are. Just like for the layman... "power" and "energy" are the same thing.That's like saying torque and horsepower are the same thing.